Professor Veena Sahajwalla – 2023 Women in Design Award

THE WOMEN IN DESIGN AWARD WAS ESTABLISHED IN RESPONSE TO THE SIGNIFICANT GENDER IMBALANCE WITHIN LEADERSHIP ROLES IN THE DESIGN INDUSTRY.

THE AWARD SEEKS TO RECOGNISE AND CELEBRATE WOMEN WHO HAVE MADE SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE INDUSTRY AND ENCOURAGE MORE DIVERSE AND EQUAL REPRESENTATION ACROSS DESIGN AND CREATIVE SPACES.

Renowned for her sustainable engineering innovations and significant contributions to a waste-free world, Professor Veena Sahajwalla has aptly earned the sobriquet “eco-alchemist”. Throughout her storied career, she has reimagined what our society sees as waste, working closely with industry to solidify recycling processes that see environmental, economical and communities priorities in perfect balance.

Beginning her journey in Mumbai, India, Veena has pioneered the face of “green manufacturing” across the world, first in Canada and now in Australia, where she serves as the founding Director of the Centre for Sustainable Materials Research & Technology (SMaRT) at UNSW. 

More than 380 peer-reviewed papers underline her trail-blazing legacy, as do multiple transformational projects and models. Her time at the SMaRT Centre steered the development of Green Steel – green alloys produced using end-of-life-plastics instead of coking coal – and the invention of the micro-factory model – small-scale factories that enable global communities to produce essential products, materials and resources from local waste. She has also launched a mentoring program for women in science called Science 50:50.

Veena was elected as Fellow of the Australian Institution of Engineers Australia in 2005, followed shortly after by her election as a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering in 2007. In 2014, she was awarded an ARC Australian Laureate Fellowship and in 2016, named one of Australia’s Most Innovative Engineers by Engineers Australia. Throughout all of this, Veena has made regular appearances as a judge on the long-running ABC TV series The New Inventors and has spoken at numerous prestigious summits worldwide.

This year, Veena has been awarded the Women in Design Award as part of the 2023 Australian Good Design Awards. Good Design Australia were lucky enough to catch up with Veena ahead of the year’s Awards Ceremony.


Good Design Australia: An “eco-alchemist” is what you’re affectionately referred to as. What was it that inspired you to see mountains of rubbish and waste materials in our society is more than just that? What kickstarted this alchemy journey?  

Veena Sahajwalla: I guess it makes me go back and reflect on how I’ve always looked at any kind of material. I’ve got to the point where I’m fixated, always looking at things on the streets when people throw stuff out. They’re throwing it away as rubbish! But sometimes we need to slow down a bit and think about all these things that we’re calling waste. It’s not really waste, it’s a product – it’s things that were used in a home or elsewhere.

Part of that is also a reflection on the fact that we put a lot of energy and effort into making things. All of it has value, even a simple item of clothing or a pair of shoes, and it’s important to look at the many different ways in which we can do the right thing with it, whether it’s to purchase something in the first place, or find a new home for a product that we no longer need. 

Sometimes, we all get super busy, so it’s just easy to kind of throw things out, but I think that extra effort does make a difference to people’s lives. It’s why it’s important to reflect on how we can make a difference at an individual level, but then also, as an engineer myself, look at materials, not as something that’s a waste, but as something that’s a resource that can have life that continues over and over again. 

GDA: Looking at your contributions to a waste-free world and commitment to circular design and engineering innovations, how do you balance the “green” with the economic side of things?

VS: We have to be able to think in a holistic manner. It’s about the balance between what is good for the environment and what’s good for the economy. We’ve got to think about the longer term impact on our planet. If we just go down the path of making something cheap and think, “well, that’s the only way we’re going to create more jobs”, you’re missing out on opportunities. There is so much potential for innovations that can create completely different jobs that have not existed before. We can build a whole new economy that’s built on circularity, all while thinking about the practical side of creating local and regional solutions. 

If you think about a situation where a little town has no access to, say, infrastructure, or tiles for their homes, study tables for their classrooms, the regular train of thought is that the only option is to get in from a long distance. But what if you could turn that upside down and start to think about how you could support local jobs and local economies with things manufactured right there from the waste that they produce? Of course, they still need to be durable, fit for purpose and aesthetically pleasing, but the material element of the supply chain can be sorted with resources that would have otherwise ended up in landfill. 

That’s exactly what we’re doing with one of our industry partners, in a regional town in New South Wales, where we are bringing in all these waste resources like glass and textiles and putting that back into production to create ceramic tiles. We’re then shifting our mindset to understand that, just because something has reached the end of life in one application, it doesn’t mean that we can’t bring that back to life in a new application. If we can keep doing that, then we can create good outcomes for our economy, environment and for people. 

Scientia Professor Veena Sahajwalla – engineer, inventor and recipient of the 2023 Women in Design Award

GDA: A lot of your work is a very hands-on, practical and physical kind of engineering. How important is genuinely understanding how to work, physically, with the materials and processes as you design and innovate?

VS: Extremely important. It’s not very impactful going, ‘I’ve developed this concept in my head, now I’m going to let somebody else worry about the implementation’. The ideas and the doing have to go hand in hand, because it’s always a complex process of ensuring that a way of thinking is actually practical or manufacturable.

It’s important to understand the whole system of thinking around supply chains, the viability of the materials and the way it’s manufactured. This ensures those raw ideas can create true transformations. It may well be that it might not work in the first go, in fact, more than likely, that’s not going to be the case at all. So, it’s all about that iterative process, the testing – the whole hands-on journey.

GDA: Mentorship is a massive part of instilling this theoretical and practical knowledge, and it’s something you’re very involved in. Tell us a bit about the Science 50:50 mentoring programme and your hopes for non-male identifying innovators looking into the future.

VS: One of the things I really love about the work that I do is that it’s such an emotive thing to be involved at that practical level. It doesn’t matter what your discipline is, what experiences you’ve had in life or what part of the world you’ve come from, there’s just this innate part of us in this field that wants to do good. We all want to make a contribution, but when you listen to stories that say that engineering is such a male-dominated area and people steer clear – that’s not what I want.

So I do feel that it’s important to engage young people who are still thinking about what they want to do in their lives, what they want to study. Young people don’t have to decide right at the start that they want to be an engineer, or a scientist, or an architect, so we wanted to give them an opportunity to explore what they were passionate and excited about. We’re on our way towards inspiring future generations that are going to look towards this field of work as a cool way to play a part in making a really positive impact on our planet – whoever they are.

GDA: What does winning the Women in Design Award mean to you?

VS: There are so many women in Australia and the world who do amazing work. We are really privileged that we have so many incredible women who are so passionate about the kind of work they do and about caring for our people and our planet. I just feel really humbled that I’m considered in the mix of these incredible women.

It wouldn’t have been possible without the support of the SMaRT Centre at UNSW, so I’d love to appreciate the important role it’s played in this journey. If it weren’t for the ability to set up a micro-factory at UNSW, we wouldn’t have taken that step to the lab, to piloting and into real world applications. I think we need to also reflect on the fact that, when research happens in the lab environment, all the backing comes from the environment that supports you. 

It doesn’t matter what career path you follow, as long as you’re pursuing your passion. Just know that Australian universities, industries and businesses can offer you real-world experience, and that’s a real privilege. Making a positive impact and contribution to our planet starts right here in Australia. This Award is all part of that. 


VIEW ALL 2023 GOOD DESIGN AWARD WINNERS HERE

Marc Newson – 2023 Australian Design Prize

THE AUSTRALIAN DESIGN PRIZE WAS ESTABLISHED TO RECOGNISE INDIVIDUAL DESIGNERS WHO ARE MAKING, OR HAVE MADE, A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT IN AUSTRALIAN DESIGN OVER THE COURSE OF THEIR CAREER.

Born in Sydney before embarking on his global design career, Marc Newson is an innovator routinely noted as one of the most influential designers of our modern generation. From his roots in jewellery making at Sydney College of the Arts, to his later work alongside Qantas, Louis Vuitton and Ferrari, Marc’s idiosyncratic touch has traversed industries, helping redefine design processes, possibilities and philosophies along the way.

Lockheed Lounge (1988) – Karin Catt

Marc staged his first exhibition in 1986 at the age of 23, and by 25, had introduced the Black Hole Table, Embryo Chair and the Lockheed Lounge to the world. The Embryo Chair has never ceased production, whereas the Lockheed Lounge was graced by Madonna in her 1993 Rain music video, and later set the record for the most expensive object ever sold by a living designer on the secondary market. 

Marc moved to Tokyo in the late 80s, honing his furniture crafts. He moved to Paris in 1991 and settled in London in 1997, where he established his design studio, Marc Newson Limited. Since then, Marc has held senior positions at clients’ companies such as Qantas and Apple, and began the LoveFrom creative collective alongside Sir Jonathon Ive in 2019. 

Sydney First Class Lounge, Qantas (2007) – Brett Boardman

Many of Marc’s pieces now reside in the permanent collections of major museums, with his body of work the subject of numerous publications, documentaries and radio programs. His string of awards and distinctions include a CBE (Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire) presented by Queen Elizabeth II, an appointment as a Royal Designer for Industry by the Royal Society of Arts, and honorary doctorates from the Royal College of Art and The University of Sydney, which further expound his illustrious legacy. He is also the only industrial designer represented by Gagosian.

This year, he adds the coveted Australian Design Prize to his mantelpiece in recognition of his ongoing contributions to Australian design. Good Design Australia caught up with Marc to discuss the incredible accolade, his philosophies of good design, the globalised design industry and the impactful nature of design.


Good Design Australia: Brushing shoulders with the likes of Robert Pataki, Ros and John Moriarty, and Carl Nielsen, what does it mean to you to be the recipient of the Australian Design Prize? 

Marc Newson: It’s obviously a huge honour and a very well-timed one, because I’m turning 60 this year, which is a bit of a milestone. I also figured out the other day that I’ve been working professionally now for about 40 years, so it’s an incredibly auspicious and symbolic moment personally. My forthcoming monograph being published by Taschen chronicles this four-decade period and just about every project. 

To receive this Award and to be honoured in Australia is also special, because it will always be my home country. I’ll always be Australian, and I’ll always be regarded as an Australian designer, which is something I’m very proud of. It’s a big deal. I would hazard a guess to say that I’ve not received any award, anywhere in the world, as significant as this. A big thank you to everyone.

021C Concept Car, Ford Motor Co (1999)- Ford Motor Company

GDA: The Australian Design Prize celebrates individuals that have had a significant contribution to Australian design. Is there anything that sticks out to you when you think of Australian design?

MN: I think, for slightly counterintuitive reasons, the answer is no. The reality is now that design has become a truly global enterprise or industry. I believe there was a time when one could potentially identify geographically where something may have been conceived or designed. That might not be the case anymore, but I’m very happy to say that, for all of the right reasons, Australian design sits, in an international context, with design globally.

It’s for those reasons that I feel that identifying the geographical characteristics of design becomes more and more difficult, and in a sense, more and more problematic. Design is really, truly one of the most global industries. Every designer I know, regardless of where they come from, is obliged to work wherever the work takes them. That’s as true for Australians as it is for designers everywhere. Australia sits within the context of international design, alongside other places historically championed and recognised for design.

GDA: Something that’s regularly mentioned about your work and designs, notably by Sir Jonathan Ive  – that you have a deep understanding of the materials and the processes. How would you respond to that assertion?

MN: It’s critical and relevant for all areas of design. For example, if you work across a broad range of mediums within the design world, I’d say this understanding of materials and processes is the whole point really. People would argue that you’d perhaps risk being a jack of all trades and master of none, whereas I would argue that you can be a master of all trades. It boils down to learning and a command of your expertise.

I’m a big believer in the ability to be self-taught. I don’t necessarily believe you need to study automotive design to learn how to design a car, or to study naval architecture to design boats. A lot of these things you can learn in the same amount of time or less that it would take you in a tertiary institution. 

GDA: Your designs are often described as “biomorphic”. Do you feel as if Australia’s naturality and organic connection is something that informs this style?

MN: At best, you may be able to liken it to a certain philosophy, I’m not sure how any of those things necessarily manifest themselves physically. Maybe they did at a moment in time, and they were identified with Australia by those characteristics. But who decided that? Was it decided by Europeans who were looking for a way to digest what was happening in Australia? I personally think that if those indicators existed, once upon a time, they’re not that prevalent anymore – and I think that’s a positive thing.

GDA: Another inspirational element that you’ve mentioned in the past is the contemporary youth culture of Australia. What about this culture attracted you, or still attracts you?

MN: I think it’s largely a philosophical manifestation that you see playing out through my work, but I believe it’s the ability to be able to seamlessly work across a broad range of media or industries in a way that expresses a general open mindedness and flexibility that Australians tend to take for granted- but are certainly not the norm in Europe. These are some of the attributes that could be identified in ‘youth culture.’ 

As I’ve mentioned, I don’t like the idea of being able to identify something characteristically or visually based on where it was created- in the world of design at least. It may be appropriate in music, it may be appropriate in film or other areas of creative expression, but I think design has a unique ability and indeed duty to cut through all of those boundaries. 

The idea of stuff that’s designed and made in Australia being available globally makes me happy. I don’t like the idea of stuff being only exclusively available in certain places. I think, in many ways, that represents a degree of failure.

GDA: Twisting the frame back onto design’s role in our modern world, and noting your involvement in numerous charitable efforts throughout the years, how would you describe design’s potential to face or challenge societal or environmental issues?

MN: We are, as a community, just scratching the surface really – in a good way. There’s an enormous amount more that can and should be done. It’s an area of design that, in itself, holds a profound space within the world. We inhabit it professionally, yet we’re able to exploit it much more effectively. It’s because design is an industry that lacks the conservatism and the shackles of many, many other professions. It’s incumbent on all of us in the design world to lead that space.

GDA: You’ve commented on the landscape and design community changing a lot over the years. Noting on that sense of evolution, do you have any advice or ideas that you would pass along to people that are just getting into their careers.

MN: Oddly enough, it’s the same advice that I would have given 20 years ago, and that is to get out there and do it- to be proactive physically. I’ve always felt very strongly about the necessity to be able to create physically and craft physically, to learn more about tools and to understand how things are made. 

I think this becomes far more relevant now given that the threshold to being a designer, or being perceived as a good designer, is perhaps much lower than it has ever been. This is good, but practical knowledge is something which is learned and earned. It’s incredibly valuable for good designers to possess thorough knowledge about how things are made and understand why things were made this way.

Finally, as an end note, I’d like to say a huge thank you. I am so proud to receive this honour.

Main Image (Top): Marc Newson Credit – Prudence Cumming Associates Ltd Courtesy Gagosian 2022


VIEW ALL 2023 GOOD DESIGN AWARD WINNERS HERE